Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 02.07.2025 07:10

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

What’s next?

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Tattle Life: Celebs say gossip forum ruined their lives. Now its owner has been unmasked - BBC

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

What is every dictators biggest fear?

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

5 daily habits suggested by top US doctor that protect the brain from early cognitive decline - Times of India

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sapiente nemo autem perspiciatis.

Let’s just make it real clear:

Thank you.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Experts say THIS diet can significantly reduce blood pressure, even in people with diabetes - Times of India

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

10 Albums Out This Week You Should Listen to Now - Pitchfork

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

PC modding repository Nexus Mods has a new owner - The Verge

Just in the last 5 years:

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

The Strait of Hormuz is a vital route for oil. Closing it could backfire on Iran - AP News

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Russia can stop this any time.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Dave Chappelle and Mo Amer on Politics and Comedy, SNL Monologues - Variety